While the Pope did meet with victims of abuse in Malta, he also stayed on his favorite topic---the evils of the dictatorship of relativism. Is he willfully blind to the dictatorship of relativism practiced by the Vatican? In the meantime, Nicholas Kristoff writes an elegant piece on the 'other Catholicism'. The one I love. The one the actually lives the Gospel.

A Church Mary Can Love
By NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF - NY Times - Published: April 17, 2010

I heard a joke the other day about a pious soul who dies, goes to heaven, and gains an audience with the Virgin Mary. The visitor asks Mary why, for all her blessings, she always appears in paintings as a bit sad, a bit wistful: Is everything O.K.?

Mary reassures her visitor: “Oh, everything’s great. No problems. It’s just ... it’s just that we had always wanted a daughter.”

That story comes to mind as the Vatican wrestles with the consequences of a patriarchal premodern mind-set: scandal, cover-up and the clumsiest self-defense since Watergate. That’s what happens with old boys’ clubs.

It wasn’t inevitable that the Catholic Church would grow so addicted to male domination, celibacy and rigid hierarchies. Jesus himself focused on the needy rather than dogma, and went out of his way to engage women and treat them with respect.

The first-century church was inclusive and democratic, even including a proto-feminist wing and texts. The Gospel of Philip, a Gnostic text from the third century, declares of Mary Magdalene: “She is the one the Savior loved more than all the disciples.” Likewise, the Gospel of Mary (from the early second century) suggests that Jesus entrusted Mary Magdalene to instruct the disciples on his religious teachings. (I think it's more appropriate to use the term spiritual teachings.)

St. Paul refers in Romans 16 to a first-century woman named Junia as prominent among the early apostles, and to a woman named Phoebe who served as a deacon. The Apostle Junia became a Christian before St. Paul did (chauvinist translators have sometimes rendered her name masculine, with no scholarly basis).

Yet over the ensuing centuries, the church reverted to strong patriarchal attitudes, while also becoming increasingly uncomfortable with sexuality. The shift may have come with the move from house churches, where women were naturally accepted, to more public gatherings.

The upshot is that proto-feminist texts were not included when the Bible was compiled (and were mostly lost until modern times). Tertullian, an early Christian leader, denounced women as “the gateway to the devil,” while a contemporary account reports that the great Origen of Alexandria took his piety a step further and castrated himself.

The Catholic Church still seems stuck today in that patriarchal rut. The same faith that was so pioneering that it had Junia as a female apostle way back in the first century can’t even have a woman as the lowliest parish priest. Female deacons, permitted for centuries, are banned today.
That old boys’ club in the Vatican became as self-absorbed as other old boys’ clubs, like Lehman Brothers, with similar results. And that is the reason the Vatican is floundering today.

But there’s more to the picture than that. In my travels around the world, I encounter two Catholic Churches. One is the rigid all-male Vatican hierarchy that seems out of touch when it bans condoms even among married couples where one partner is H.I.V.-positive. To me at least, this church — obsessed with dogma and rules and distracted from social justice — is a modern echo of the Pharisees whom Jesus criticized.

Yet there’s another Catholic Church as well, one I admire intensely. This is the grass-roots Catholic Church that does far more good in the world than it ever gets credit for. This is the church that supports extraordinary aid organizations like Catholic Relief Services and Caritas, saving lives every day, and that operates superb schools that provide needy children an escalator out of poverty.

This is the church of the nuns and priests in Congo, toiling in obscurity to feed and educate children. This is the church of the Brazilian priest fighting AIDS who told me that if he were pope, he would build a condom factory in the Vatican to save lives.

This is the church of the Maryknoll Sisters in Central America and the Cabrini Sisters in Africa. There’s a stereotype of nuns as stodgy Victorian traditionalists. I learned otherwise while hanging on for my life in a passenger seat as an American nun with a lead foot drove her jeep over ruts and through a creek in Swaziland to visit AIDS orphans. After a number of encounters like that, I’ve come to believe that the very coolest people in the world today may be nuns.

So when you read about the scandals, remember that the Vatican is not the same as the Catholic Church. Ordinary lepers, prostitutes and slum-dwellers may never see a cardinal, but they daily encounter a truly noble Catholic Church in the form of priests, nuns and lay workers toiling to make a difference.

It’s high time for the Vatican to take inspiration from that sublime — even divine — side of the Catholic Church, from those church workers whose magnificence lies not in their vestments, but in their selflessness. They’re enough to make the Virgin Mary smile. (Unfortunately, the Vatican, Opus Dei, the Neo Cats, the Legionaires, and other conservative apostolates and their supporters will never let this happen.)

***********************************************

Do I think that Pope Benedict cares about the victims? Yes, but not as much as he cares about defending and protecting his fantasy of the priesthood and hierarchical authority and his supposed direct pipe line to God. I keep hoping to read a quote of his that actually mentions his desire to clean out the filth in the Vatican, but I don't. I keep hoping to read that he met with victims as an equal and not surrounded by reminders of his authority. It never happens.

Here's John Allen's report on Benedict's meeting with Maltese victims:

Lombardi said the session took place in the chapel of the residence of the papal nuncio, or ambassador, in Malta. It began with a moment of silent prayer, and then Benedict moved near the altar to meet the victims one-by-one, allowing them to say "whatever they wished to say," Lombardi said. (yes, this is exactly the kind of setting which is going to foster one on one honest communication. Let's not forget boys, just who you are talking too.)

The pope also responded to the victims individually, in either English or Italian, Lombardi said, but did not offer any general remarks.

The meeting concluded with a common prayer in Maltese, and the pope gave each victim a rosary.

The victims were accompanied by two local Maltese bishops, while the pope was joined by a senior Vatican official, his private secretary, and his nuncio in Malta.

Everything about this meeting is contraindicated in doing real therapy for real healing. I suspect a number of these victims will experience some form of PTSD triggering and when the Vatican fails to deliver meaningful change they will join other survivors who have met the Pope and been sorely disappointed with the over all experience. A point John Allen makes:

On previous occassions when victims have met the pope, their first-blush reactions are generally positive, but over time some have argued that the promise of those meetings has not yet resulted in sufficient policy changes.

It is very very difficult for me to imagine Jesus standing at the Arc in the Temple and meeting with the sexual abuse victims of His anointed Apostles and handing them rosaries. "I'm on it, really." he says. "Go and sin no more." It's much easier to envision Mary coming unglued with Jesus for his lack of empathy, token concern, and obvious need to remind victims of his authority.

The Church of Mary would have dropped the pomp and met with victims in their reality, where victims actually have to live the consequences of priestly abuse. Like in prison.

Speaking of Mary, the Vatican has formed another visitation body to look into Medjugorge. Apparently in some messages Mary is not towing the company line. I will get into this visitation in more detail in another post, but there is zero question in my mind, that this visitation will not return a favorable report. At this particular time, when the entire authority structure is being put under a microscope, the Vatican can' afford to have Mary floating around and demanding they clean their act up. Especially when her seers are all married lay people. One last thought, it's really interesting that most of the fraud associated with Medjugorge has come from ordained clerics. Coincidence or part of the message?