WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Bush administration has launched a "significant escalation" of covert operations in Iran, sending U.S. commandos to spy on the country's nuclear facilities and undermine the Islamic republic's government, journalist Seymour Hersh said Sunday.
An Iranian flag flies outside the building containing the reactor of Bushehr nuclear power plant, south of Tehran.
White House, CIA and State Department officials declined comment on Hersh's report, which appears in this week's issue of The New Yorker.
Hersh told CNN's "Late Edition with Wolf Blitzer" that Congress has authorized up to $400 million to fund the secret campaign, which involves U.S. special operations troops and Iranian dissidents. {How did our respective elective representatives vote on this bill? Did Obama vote 'Present', and McCain vote 'Yes'?}
An Iranian flag flies outside the building containing the reactor of Bushehr nuclear power plant, south of Tehran.
White House, CIA and State Department officials declined comment on Hersh's report, which appears in this week's issue of The New Yorker.
Hersh told CNN's "Late Edition with Wolf Blitzer" that Congress has authorized up to $400 million to fund the secret campaign, which involves U.S. special operations troops and Iranian dissidents. {How did our respective elective representatives vote on this bill? Did Obama vote 'Present', and McCain vote 'Yes'?}
President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney have rejected findings from U.S. intelligence agencies that Iran has halted a clandestine effort to build a nuclear bomb and "do not want to leave Iran in place with a nuclear program," Hersh said.
"They believe that their mission is to make sure that before they get out of office next year, either Iran is attacked or it stops its weapons program," Hersh said. {One has to suppose that Iran being attacked is the more sure bet for these two.}
The new article, "Preparing the Battlefield," is the latest in a series of articles accusing the Bush administration of preparing for war with Iran.
He based the report on accounts from current and former military, intelligence, and congressional sources. Watch Hersh discuss what he says are the administration's plans for Iran
"As usual with his quarterly pieces, we'll decline to comment," White House spokesman Gordon Johndroe told CNN. {This comment is not a denial.}
"The CIA, as a rule, does not comment on allegations regarding covert operations," CIA spokesman Paul Gimigliano said. {This is true, but it's also not a denial. We are talking military intervention with another country--again.}
Ryan Crocker, the U.S. ambassador in Baghdad, denied U.S. raids were being launched from Iraq, where American commanders believe Iran is stoking sectarian warfare and fomenting attacks on U.S. troops.
"I can tell you flatly that U.S. forces are not operating across the Iraqi border into Iran, in the south or anywhere else," Crocker said. {But what about Afghanistan?}
Hersh said U.S. efforts were staged from Afghanistan, which also shares a border with Iran.
He said the program resulted in "a dramatic increase in kinetic events and chaos" inside Iran, including attacks by Kurdish separatists in the country's north and a May attack on a mosque in Shiraz that killed 13 people. {Good from Bush's standpoint, I guess our clandestine interference is resulting in more death.}
The United States has said it is trying to isolate Iran diplomatically in order to get it to come clean about its nuclear ambitions. But Bush has said "all options" are open in dealing with the issue. {That also includes a pre-emptive strike, otherwise know as agressive war making.}
Iran insists its nuclear program is aimed at providing civilian electric power, and refuses to comply with U.N. Security Council demands that it halt uranium enrichment work.
U.N. nuclear inspectors say Tehran held back critical information that could determine whether it is trying to make nuclear weapons. {This is just enough of a question of motive for Bush to act. I have to say North Korea appears to have backed down, why don't we let similar 'diplomacy' have the same effect in Iran?}
Israel, which is believed to have its own nuclear arsenal, conducted a military exercise in the eastern Mediterranean in early June involving dozens of warplanes and aerial tankers.
The distance involved in the exercise was roughly the same as would be involved in a possible strike on the Iranian nuclear fuel plant at Natanz, Iran, a U.S. military official said. {That must just be a coincidence, (not) and by the way, nobody doubts Israel has their own nuclear weapons. That's the principle reason Iran wants them.}
In 1981, Israeli warplanes destroyed an Iraqi nuclear reactor.
Iran's parliament speaker, Ali Larijani, warned other countries against moves that would "cost them heavily." In comments that appeared in the semi-official Mehr news agency Sunday, an Iranian general said his troops were digging more than 320,000 graves to bury troops from any invading force with "the respect they deserve." {This is a wonderful propaganda statement to let us know how many foot troops will be killed if we invade. About three times more than we would have available.}
"Under the law of war and armed conflict, necessary preparations must be made for the burial of soldiers of aggressor nations," said Maj. Gen. Mirfaisal Baqerzadeh, an Iranian officer in charge of identifying soldiers missing in action.
_________________________________________________________
This kind of makes one wonder just what GW and BXVI were discussing in the Vatican Gardens a couple of weeks ago. Makes one wonder why all the protocal changes to give these two gentlemen such privacy. They both seem to have the same agenda and that's the salvation of Western culture from the hordes of Islam. They both seem to combine their own versions of Faith and reason. Might that combination lead to another war. This time one with Iran and with Benedict strangely silent, and Israel the excuse. Seems the West has used Jews for the excuse for their wars before. With them or against them, the Jews seem to be the straw that stirs the drink. I wonder why that is?
Frankly, this article scares me because it baldly states that Bush will act before he's replaced. Do McCain or Obama really want to have to deal with three wars? Do the people behind Bush really fear that neither McCain nor Obama will follow their agenda? This is truly scarey stuff.
I will be praying that reason will prevail and Bush will be stopped.
No comments:
Post a Comment