|Now I get why everything Pope Benedict does is focused on the right side of things. It's his right sided glasses.|
Pope Benedict turned 84 yesterday and will mark his seventh anniversary as Pope tomorrow. Today word has come through John Allen that SSPX seems ready to return to the fold. What a birthday/anniversary present that will be for this Pope since he's spent over one million dollars trying to effect this very thing. The one consistent thing about Benedict is it seems impossible to be too reactionary for his tastes in liturgy and obedience. The following is from the Irish Times. It was written by Patsy McGarry. I suspect she speaks for a lot of us that have moved well past lace, incense, and fear inspired obedience.
Pope has consistently come down on dissent within the church like a hammerOPINION: TOMORROW is the seventh anniversary of the election of Pope Benedict XVI on April 19th, 2005. The scenes on St Peter’s Square that afternoon illustrated what this divisive figure has meant for his church.
Middle-aged and older people were crestfallen. A man sat at one of the great fountains in the square and wept openly. Around him danced seminarians from the North American College.
Well-scrubbed and in cassocks, they could not contain their glee. “Benedicto, Benedicto, Benedicto,” they shouted. “It’s a regular party,” a seminarian from Pittsburg told this reporter.
For them, the election of John Paul II’s enforcer as pope represented the final defeat of that liberal Catholicism ushered in following Vatican II which they and their mentors see as at the root of all that is wrong in the church today. The rigid certainties enforced by the new pope had so much more appeal for them than the porous, inclusive Catholicism of the previous generation. (As did ritual magic as opposed to the hard work of practical mysticism.)
Pope Benedict’s views were well-known, as were his attitudes to dissent. As prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF), Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger helped to force closed many windows thrown open by Pope John XXIII and Vatican II.
For instance, where ecumenism was concerned and in his infamous Dominus Iesus document of 2000, he dismissed all reformed churches as not churches “in the proper sense”. They were merely “ecclesial communities”. All other faiths were “gravely deficient”. In 1997, he described Buddhism as an “auto-erotic spirituality”. Hinduism was based on a concept of reincarnation resembling “a continuous circle of hell”.
(The potential addition of SSPX follows this trend of down playing ecumenism. I can't wait for the spin about this move invented for the Jewish community.)
On celibacy, women priests or women in the diaconate, he was immovable. Similarly on the use of condoms even to combat Aids. On homosexuality he was virulent. In 1986, he described it as a “strong tendency ordered towards an intrinsic moral evil; and thus the inclination itself must be seen as an objective disorder”.
Where dissent was concerned he brooked no hostages. It extended to former colleagues such as Hans Küng. In 1966, at Küng’s instigation, the Catholic faculty at Germany’s Tübingen university appointed Fr Ratzinger professor of dogmatics. In 1979, Küng was stripped of his licence to teach because he challenged papal infallibility. In 1981, when Ratzinger became dean of the CDF, he upheld that decision.
In 1986, he stopped US priest Fr Charles Curran from teaching because of his views on sexuality and ethics. A Brazilian, Fr Leonardo Boff, was silenced twice by him, in 1985 and in 1991. Fr Robert Nugent and Sr Jeannine Gramick, who worked with gay people in the US, were sanctioned in 1999. In 1995, Sri Lankan theologian Fr Tissa Belasuriya was excommunicated by him over writings on Mary, original sin and the divinity of Christ. He was later reconciled with the church.
There were so many more. (Over a hundred more--that we know of.)
There is also something deeply insidious about the methods he and Rome use to silence those who disagree, as we have seen in Ireland. You might say Rome has ways of making you “think with the mind of the church” (sentire com ecclesia), in that memorable phrase directed by Rome at Fr Tony Flannery last month as he was told “ . . . to a monastery go!”
The Irish Times has, for instance, been aware for years of the curt silencing of three other Irish priests/theologians as they sought their way to a more compassionate, Christian understanding of human life. All three belong to different religious congregations.
In all instances, the head of their congregation was summoned to the CDF in Rome after anonymous complaint. The congregation head was advised to bring the “dissident” into line. He in turn contacted the congregation head in Ireland. The “dissident” was summoned and confronted with his aberration.
Usually, at local level, the relevant head has been kind. The priest/theologian in each case has been torn between a need to articulate his convictions for the benefit of the distressed and the consequences this for his congregation. Each priest felt he had to accept silence. (This is called forcing compliance through blackmail.)
In each case too, those of us in the media aware of it were asked not to write about this lest the sky fall and bring further misery on the already crushed. So Rome has had its way and through exploiting finer human emotions such as loyalty and respect. Clever? Yes, but hardly Christian.
Odds are Pope Benedict will salute himself with another pontifical prelature ala Opus Dei, or another Ordinariate like he created for the Anglican version of SSPX and all the lace wearing will be draping the bodies of men. In the meantime I'm breathlessly waiting for the new Papal perfume in honor of this latest move. Oh wait, Pope Benedict already commissioned his own special cologne.
Pope Benedict can silence all the progressive theologians he can, and he will, and he can keep bringing into the fold all the reactionary cults he can find, and he will, but he will not be able to stop the flood of information pouring into the light of day about the corruption and criminal behavior of the Vatican and it's leadership. Surrounding himself with fellow religious tyrants may make him feel safer, but it's a delusion. The flood is for reform is building and building in one country after another. Choices are being made and not just by SSPX.
I think you should credit Patsy McGarry of the Irish Times with this piece.ReplyDelete
oops, you did. ApologiesReplyDelete
The Pope promotes ritual magic?ReplyDelete
That's a pretty outlandish claim...
Depends on how you define ritual magic. Historically the Latin version of the Mass with it's strict repetition has been one blue print for ritual magic. I'm using the idea here more in a superstitious sense. The idea being if things aren't repeated just exactly right, bad things happen. It's almost a form of superstition in which God is controlled by our words.ReplyDelete
That describes a very small god coupled with a very scared human.
The "Latin version" is the same as the "English version" and the "Japanese version". The Mass follows the same format that it did in the Early Church, the translations are of the same words. Especially now that we've got the 'pro multis' bit ironed out again.Delete
It's not paranoia, or superstition. Just ask any priest. It's about respect for the liturgy, respect for the Mass as that thing through which we come to touch God, as that appalling and wondrous gift.
You have seriously misunderstood the liturgy.